Many Westerners hold misconceptions about Middle Eastern women. They are not powerless, and Islam is compatible with women’s rights.
Candidates wave during a rally ahead of parliamentary elections in Jordan, 2 September 2016. (EPA/Jamal Nasrallah)
Many Westerners hold misconceptions about the rights and liberties of Middle Eastern women. They view our women as powerless figures who exist to please men, while making no real contributions to society.
This image is false, but it is not without real sources.
The prominent and media-savvy terrorist organization Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (SIL) is in large part to blame, says Reem Abu Hassan, a former minister of Social Development in Jordan. ISIL’s violent and patriarchal practices have reinforced Western perceptions that Middle Eastern women are powerless and that the region needs to be led towards notions of democracy and progress.
European countries are also to blame: their interventions into our region — both historically and in recent times — have helped spark a politics of opposition as well as religious fundamentalism.
The intrusions of European nations into our territories and societies have made many Arabs fearful of being Westernized, of forfeiting their sovereignty.
That fear has manifested itself in various ways, including in widespread opposition to advancing women’s rights. Since many people associate such advancement with the feminist movement in the West, they perceive opposition to it as one way to fight Westernization.
What is more, some conservatives have misinterpreted the Quran, encouraging some men to think they have the authority to do anything to keep women in check.
Finding solutions based on local traditions
As a longstanding advocate of women’s rights in Jordan, Hassan has a great many ideas on how to promote the movement without threatening traditions or sense of identity.
One way is to find local solutions to problems
For example, Hassan once headed the legal team attached to a family protection project combating domestic violence. They wanted to establish a legal basis to open shelters for battered women.
The lawyers sought solutions based on Jordan’s tribal traditions to avoid accusations that they were importing Western ideas.
In their research they came across the practice of aldakhala: When a woman seeks the protection of a tribe, she is placed in the tribe’s women’s quarters. For three days, the tribe’s chief does not talk to her, to provide her enough time to calm down. After the three days, he asks her questions to understand her reasons for seeking refuge and then becomes her advocate.
In modern times, the state plays the role of tribe chief, Hassan said. It is the state’s duty to open shelters for women who seek protection.
The solution offers the benefit of upholding Jordan’s traditions while being compatible with international women’s rights standards, Hassan noted.
“International standards and international conventions are created from people’s experiences all around the world, and we’re no different — we are part of this global village,” she said. “So it is always easy to find the compatibility between those international standards and what you have in your own culture, your own religion and your social norms, and put them together in one recipe.”
Islamic texts are frequently misinterpreted.
Hassan does not see Arabism or Islam as contradicting women’s rights, although religious theory can diverge greatly from practice.
Jordan’s women’s movement aims to ensure Islamic texts are interpreted in a way that empowers women while defending women from violence that can result from fundamentalists’ misinterpretation of scripture.
“The women’s movement has been working on this since 1992, when we were working towards preparing Jordan to participate in the Beijing conference of 1995,” Hassan said, referring to the United Nations conference on women that year in China’s capital. “The best way to change the social norms is through linking whatever demands you have with the true position in Islam.”
For example with respect to honor crimes, Islam holds that someone who suspects his wife of committing adultery has recourse to almola’aneh — a system that permits a husband to obtain a divorce but never to kill his wife.
Islam is a fundamental part of Middle Eastern culture. It informs our perception of life, our collective mindset and our identity. The fight for women’s rights should be embedded within it. We should emphasize the parts of Islam that help us in our fight for justice.
For the next article in this series, click here.
For the full recorded interview with Hassan, click here. For the third article in the series on Hassan, click here.
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER:
- According to the author, why have some Arabs opposed advancing women’s rights?
- What is religious fundamentalism?
- What steps have been taken in your country to protect women and ensure they are on equal footing with men?
Raghda Obeidat is in her third year of high school at King’s Academy in Madaba, Jordan. She loves reading English and Arabic literature and staying well-informed on Arab and global politics. Raghda volunteers with organizations that provide social aid and educational assistance to refugees. She also contributes to her school’s literary magazine.
And many apologists have misconceptions about the western perspective on islam and often oversimplify their views
I think your point has essentially been disproved by the other comments on this article.
Quite a ridiculous article. Islam most definitely represses women. The Quran and hadith are quite clear, as is shariah. One may pretend or wish that they say other than what they, in fact, do say, but very few Muslims would support or believe such nonsense. This is just one more attempt to hide the truth about Islam. As non-Muslims become more Islam-literate, islamists are having a harder time deceiving them. Yet they continue to try.
Among many other examples of how Islam protects and empowers women, Islam gives women full rights to their property before and after marriage. Secular, republican France did not extend this right to women until 1935. Until then a French woman’s property became her husband’s upon marriage. Muhammad’s wife Khadijah was a successful businesswoman, and he worked for her before they married. She continued to manage her business as a married woman.
The women of the first Islamic community (which live and was governed according to much-maligned sharia law) demonstrated the multiple roles that women can and should fulfil – not only as wives and mothers, but also leaders, generals, scholars, educators, businesspeople, social workers… The stories of their lives show how independent and free-willed they were.
Islam also gives women the right to divorce, e.g. if a husband is violent or unable to fulfil his wife’s sexual needs.
It is sadly true that many Muslims and Muslim cultures do not uphold the ideals and principles of Islam regarding women, whether through ignorance or by choice. But Islam, the Quran and the hadith are not the source of the problem. (People often misquote the Islamic sources, distort their interpretation, or take them out of context in order to argue the opposite, but this is intellectual dishonesty.)
This is article is highly inaccurate and doesn’t even begin to mention all the women fleeing from Saudi Arabia. If Islam was so great for women, I don’t think they would be risking their lives trying to escape to Western countries. Look at Rahaf Mohammad and Deena. Under Sharia law, a man can divorce his wife by saying Talaq 3 times. On the other hand a woman has to get permission from her husband for divorce, and if he says no, then they have to go to sharia court and go through a process of approval. Sharia court is run by men and almost always favors men, except in small rare cases. Also when it comes to polygamy, a man can have 4 wives and 1000 concubines, a woman on the other hand, can only be married to a single man. Where is the equality in here? This article was written by a Muslim so it’s ovciously biased.