By David Schlesinger
Is it China’s century? Or is China a sclerotic, debt-laden behemoth on the verge of collapse?
Is China an engine for world prosperity, first manufacturing goods for the globe, and then, with new wealth, becoming a great consumption colossus, enriching investors everywhere? Or is the world on the brink of the coming China Wars, in the words of U.S. President Trump’s adviser Peter Navarro?
Can outsiders see China clearly? Has the view ever been transparent? Or is that huge and great nation always destined to be a mirror for others’ delirious hopes and exaggerated fears?
These aren’t just idle, academic questions. The United States and China are poised for a tit-for-tat trade war that could have serious repercussions for consumers and workers in both countries. Military tensions in the South China Sea or over Taiwan could easily turn into a tragic mistake.
China is simply too large and too diverse to make blanket statements.
That we’re at this point is due in part to facts but also in large part because an earlier euphoria about China’s promise has been replaced by a new, bleak sourness.
In fact, the answer to all the questions above is: it’s complicated!
With 1.4 billion people, 15 megacities with populations of over 10 million each, provinces with economies the size of developed countries, China is simply too large and too diverse to make most blanket statements worth anything at all.
Its inner workings are also too opaque for outsiders to penetrate accurately. So many articles by very good journalists and academics at the time when Xi Jinping came to power as General Secretary of the Communist Party in 2012 and then President in 2013 predicted – or maybe it would be better to say “guessed” – that he would be a reformer.
In fact, he has concentrated power and cracked down on expression and dissent in ways not seen in decades.
How do we get it so wrong again and again?
People want definitive conclusions and the illusion of certainty.
When I think back over my time as China bureau chief for Reuters in the early 1990s and then my current efforts as an analyst trying to help companies understand trends and political risk, I think there are a number of traps that we often fall into.
1. We see it as a monolith. How many articles say confidently “China says…” or “China believes…” or “China wants…”? Do you believe blanket statements about your country? Or even your school? Blanket statements are accepted journalistic shorthand, but too often they’re built on a wobbly foundation and just can’t stand up.
2. We don’t know the whole country well at all. News organizations are based in Beijing and Shanghai; journalists spend the vast majority of their time there. Just as there’s much more to the United States than Washington and New York, and learning about the rest of the country takes much more than the occasional road trip, so too with China.
My colleagues and I travelled as much as time and budgets allowed, yet there are still vast areas of the country that have never been visited by a foreign journalist – and certainly even the brief visits journalists do make are no way to build up trusted sources.
3. We fall into the “people like us” trap too often. It’s easiest to make friends and sources with people who have similar world views and backgrounds as we ourselves have. Just think about your own circle of friends – how diverse is it really? Even with great effort it’s really hard to learn the surprising and different views, which just might turn out to be really important.
4. People want definitive conclusions and the illusion of certainty. Few will waste their time with mealy-mouthed, on-the-on-hand-on-the-other-hand analysis. Yet the seduction of binary thinking can close our eyes to the subtleties and grey areas where truth actually lies.
I’ve studied China since I was 18; I’m now 58. I think my 40-year journey has been one from black and whites into the grey area — an exciting venture into ambiguity.
THREE QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER:
- Imagine how a journalist would write a story about the most controversial thing to happen in your school this past year. What would they get right? What would they get wrong?
- What do you actually think you know about China today? Where did that knowledge come from? How confident are you in it?
- Has your view on any aspect of China changed dramatically in the past year? From what to what? Why?
David Schlesinger is the Founder and Managing Director of Tripod Advisors, a consultancy that advises on political risk analysis and strategy, and on running complex, dispersed global organizations with an emphasis on China and the media sector. He previously was Reuters’ global editor-in-chief before becoming chairman of Thomson Reuters China, responsible for government relations and businesses in financial markets, legal and regulatory databases, scientific information and journalism.
Hi David. My view is that to truly understand China or Chinese, one has to start with its history and language. Yes, its 5000 years plus history, dynastic falls and rise, its classics (required for every Chinese child but luckily many have been translated), its ancient poetry and cultural customs especially when it comes to personal and family relationships. After these, then it is actually pretty straight forward. Chinese are empathetic but logical, sentimental but practical, caring at large but self contained. And they can endure a lot and be accommodating but persistent injustice will push them over the edge and if they fight back, they are formidable opponents. Lastly, they always assess the big picture and base their decisions on long term consequences. Because they are taught to be selfless, they believe sacrificing a few to attain happiness for most is just the norm. I hope this help.
Thanks for the comment. I agree that studying language and culture can help – there are indeed deep lessons to be learned from literature and history. But beware of being the wise fool, who, armed with knowledge, still misses the point! Or as Mao said – don’t just worship books, but investigate the actual situation.