The 1960s were a zeitgeist of anti-establishment values and alternative philosophies, an age of counter-culture, hippies and yippies. I was there.
Hippies greet the sunrise in San Francisco, California, 6 October 1967 (AP Photo)
In Britain, the Sixties marked the transition from monochrome gloom to full Technicolor. The British were exhausted and impoverished by the Second World War. Austerity was the order of the day.
The Sixties did not begin in 1960 and did not end in 1969.
More than a time or a place, the Sixties were a zeitgeist of anti-establishment values and alternative philosophies.
It was the dawn of what was called “the permissive society” and became the age of the counter-culture, of hippies and yippies.
London earned the prefix “swinging”.
The Beatles came along and were embraced as a way to forget the drab, grey days of post-war rationing and shortages. Beatlemania described the intense fan frenzy that accompanied them wherever they went.
In 1963, the first review of the Rolling Stones (styled the Rollin’ Stones) was published. I wrote it after listening to them play at the Crawdaddy Club in Richmond, southwest London. Within weeks, they cut their first record, the Chuck Berry song “Come On”. (Editor’s note – In coming days we will be publishing an account by the author of that 1963 Rolling Stones concert.)
Philip Larkin caught the spirit of the age. 1963 was an Annus Mirabilis, as he wrote later in his poem of that name, when
Sexual intercourse began
In nineteen sixty-three
(which was rather late for me) –
Between the end of the “Chatterley” ban
And the Beatles’ first LP.
I began the decade as a reporter on my hometown newspaper and ended it as a foreign correspondent.
I had joined Reuters in April 1968. Within weeks, my friend and colleague Ronald Laramy was killed along with three other journalists in a Viet Cong ambush in Saigon.
In May 1968, I was outside the American Embassy in Grosvenor Square, covering student protests against the Vietnam War.
We had all come a long way from the days of youthful innocence.
It was the Prague Spring, the Tet Offensive and the My Lai Massacre.
It was anti-war protests in Europe and rioting in Chicago.
Martin Luther King was assassinated. Robert Kennedy too.
Richard Nixon ran for president.
Enoch Powell talked about “rivers of blood”.
“2001: A Space Odyssey” came out.
Full-frontal nudity was permitted on the stage in a rock musical called “Hair”.
The Beatles were still together, and Elvis was still in the room.
Barry May advises organisations on corporate communications. Previously he was a correspondent and bureau chief for Reuters in London, Johannesburg, Karachi, Rawalpindi, Beirut, New York, Washington, Tehran and Dubai. He is an award-winning corporate communications specialist and had responsibility for Reuters’ publications worldwide including magazines and video. He is the founder, editor and publisher of The Baron, a website for Reuters people, past and present.
Barry, you obviously remember the sixties well; therefore, paradoxically, you cannot have been there. Peace and love, man!
If I have to look back and replay the sequence of events historically (both thru the Print Media till the 1980s/90s and Visual-cum-Print media till now), I’d say, that the World War I allowed the opportunity for the Great European powers to try the 1st official attempt on the fate or future of the rest of the world, however that didnt happen satisfactorily, thus the WWII happened, that again it didnt bring about a clear victor, rather divided the world into the FREE WORLD and the COMMUNIST WORLD. The Communist World got cheated by itself, and the Free World got cheated by the Rest of the World (The proof of it by looking the no. of HOMELESS PEOPLE in North America & UK, another proof is by looking at the no. of Immigrants, that made it big and getting the locals under them on pay rolls).
Today, we are in a better position. Thank God America has an upper hand on the rest of the world.
Well the last statement is obviously not true anymore.