Donald Trump has promised to tackle economic inequalities. But his policies could deepen the gaping divide between the haves and the have-nots.

Donald Trump delivers his Inaugural address, Washington, 20 January 2017 (EPA/Jim Lo Scalzo)
Donald Trump delivers his Inaugural address, Washington, 20 January 2017 (EPA/Jim Lo Scalzo)

By Alan Wheatley

A defining economic characteristic of our age is that a growing chunk of national income has been flowing to corporations rather to workers. The widening wedge is a root cause of the disillusionment that led to Brexit, the rise of populist parties in Europe and the election of Donald Trump.

And one of the big, unacknowledged risks of his presidency is that his policies will deepen the divide, not bridge it.

For decades, the shares of the economic pie that went to the owners of capital and to labor barely changed. Textbooks took the apportionment as a given. Then, from the 1970s, they started to diverge. Across the world, the labor share has steadily fallen and the profit share has risen.

Among the reasons: globalization has made companies more powerful; governments have adopted pro-business policies to attract jobs; the atomization of work has weakened labor unions.

The upshot: stagnating real incomes and resentment of the political and economic order. The scapegoats: “unfair trade,” immigrants and a supposedly out-of-touch political establishment.

The stakes could not be higher.

Trump says he will address these causes. But his policies will make them worse.

  • His tax reform will slash taxes for the top one percent and for corporations.
  • Ending Obamacare will rob millions of health insurance.
  • Protectionism shields a few at the expense of the many, destroying export jobs and lowering living standards.
  • Trump’s tax cuts and extra infrastructure spending may deliver a sugar rush for the economy, but, once it has worn off, the legacy of an increased deficit and debt will remain. The result will be rising interest rates, weaker growth and eventually higher taxes that will hurt the very people who elected Trump.

If Trump’s policies do indeed fail to halt rising inequality and a decline in U.S. manufacturing jobs that goes back to 1979, voters would be right to demand fiscal and education policies that would increase the labor share of income and equip American workers with the skills needed in a global, digital, automated, service economy.

But it is surely more likely that he will double down on an “America First” strategy and, whipping up his supporters into a new frenzy, spread the blame for America’s troubles more widely. The likes of Germany, South Korea, Japan and Saudi Arabia may soon join Mexico and China in Trump’s cross-hairs.

And that is just the economics. If Trump waters down the U.S. commitment to NATO, encourages the disintegration of the European Union, undermines UN institutions and confronts Beijing by abandoning the One China policy, he will overturn the settled international political order that has underpinned decades of global growth.

The stakes could not be higher.


Alan Wheatley

Alan Wheatley is an economics writer and editor based in London, and a founding editor of InFacts. Until recently, he was Reuters’s global economics correspondent, reporting from more than 40 countries and living in London, Frankfurt, Paris, New York, Washington, Tokyo, Singapore and Beijing. He is the editor and co-author of the book “The Power of Currencies, Currencies of Power,” which explores the consequences of looming challenges to the dollar’s status as the world’s pre-eminent reserve currency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *